Pages

Monday, August 25, 2014

RE: Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

.......and that's you reason why Brightfart is better? What a dumbass you are, son.
 
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 05:32:38 -0700
From: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

100 years of history tells NOTHING OF TODAY'S NEW YORK TIMES.
 

On Sunday, August 24, 2014 12:09:37 PM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
New York times has been around for over a hundred years, Breifart has been dead for whatever along with his lying tripe except for those who tell and believe in lying and what's "vnushes"?
 
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 05:07:54 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

It will be interesting to se who emains around he longest after the othe vnushes.
 
Pretty even righ now.
On Saturday, August 23, 2014 7:07:51 PM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
What is respectable about Breifart?They say how a man lives his life is how one can reliably judge his character. Who has the bigger circulation and who has been around the longest and who will be around after the other vanishes?
 
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 07:51:41 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

What is respectable about the New York Timnes.
 
It lies worse nthan you claim Britbart does.
 
It is a Liberal rag - Losing money and readers.  It serves only thje rich spoiled Liberal base.
On Saturday, August 23, 2014 8:49:57 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
Of course, what was I thinking? The new York Times is a respectable newspaper that has been around for years and has the biggest circulation of any print news outlet, whereas Breifart was a lying, cheating, admitted publically to lying about the veracity of his tripe and killed himself by drug overdosing .What a slimy pile of dung this guy was.Thank you for bringing this horrible comparison to the thread's attention,dumbass.
 
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 05:51:04 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

Larry  -
 
Please don't compare Breitbart with the New York Times.

On Friday, August 22, 2014 7:27:31 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
breitfart= Lies and death
 
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 03:51:18 -0700
From: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
To: opendeb...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

Trading For Bergdahl Means More Foleys

breitbart.com
by 21 Aug 2014 293 post a comment

On Tuesday, ISIS terrorists beheaded American journalist James Foley. President Obama responded by bombing the fourth green during his long vacation in Martha’s Vineyard. He also lectured ISIS on the true meaning of Islam: “ISIL speaks for no religion…ISIL has no ideology of any value to human beings….One thing we can all agree on is that a group like ISIL has no place in the 21st century.”


The faculty-lounge insult approach has proved ineffective.

ISIS is now threatening to kill journalist Steven Sotloff. They reportedly hold two other Americans as well. And they will undoubtedly seek to kidnap more Americans in an attempt to leverage President Obama should the Obama administration fail to act with overwhelming force against ISIS.

There are now reports that ISIS offered to release Foley in exchange for $100 million. According to The New York Times: 

The group pressed the United States to provide a multimillion-dollar ransom for his release, according to a representative of his family and a former hostage held alongside him. The United States — unlike several European countries that have funneled millions to the terror group to spare the lives of their citizens — refused to pay.

That position would have been more credible – ISIS would likely think less of its strategy of kidnapping US citizens for ransom, either political or monetary – if the Obama administration had not traded five Taliban commanders for alleged deserter Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl just three months ago. At the time, commentators worried that such deals provided impetus to terrorist groups to kidnap Americans. Obviously, Foley was kidnapped long before Bergdahl’s release – but the Obama administration was reportedly negotiating with the Taliban over Bergdahl long before Foley was kidnapped in 2012.

The five Taliban commanders released in exchange for Bergdahl are precisely the type of terrorists committed to acts like those of ISIS. According to the Washington Post, Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa, the former Taliban interior minister, helped create the Taliban; Mullah Mohammad Fazl, former senior commander in the Taliban, allegedly “supervised the killing of thousands of Shiite Muslims between 1998 and 2001”; Mullah Norullah Noori was reportedly “involved in the Shiite massacre”; Abdul Haq Wasiq was a sort of central hub for terror as deputy chief of intelligence for the Taliban; Mohammed Nabi Omari worked with al Qaeda and the Taliban.

With ISIS and al Qaeda now having unified in their quest to kill Americans, there is little doubt that kidnapping more Americans will be at the top of the priority list.

Incompetence with regard to trading with terrorists for hostages has been a hallmark not just of the Obama administration, but of many Western countries over the past few years. Israel recently released 1,000 Palestinian terror prisoners in exchange for soldier Gilad Shalit, prompting Hamas to seek the kidnapping of as many Israelis as possible. As Joshua Keating of Slate points out, European countries routinely deal with terrorists. Add America to that group – except, oddly, in the case of Foley.

The Obama administration revealed yesterday that it launched a rescue attempt by Special Forces, but that the operation failed. Such operations are commendable. In retrospect, it would have been just as commendable not to turn over the world’s worst terrorists in exchange for a hostage, given the fact that such terrorists happily slit the throats of kidnapped Americans once released.

Ben Shapiro is Senior Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the new book, The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against The Obama Administration (Threshold Editions, June 10, 2014). He is also Editor-in-Chief of TruthRevolt.org. Follow Ben Shapiro on Twitter @benshapiro.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebatefor...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendeb...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Posted by Castro at 5:36 AM

0 comments:

Post a Comment