Young enough to be your grandson.Now you answer the question you 83 year old parasite.
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:39:02 -0800
> Subject: Re: Obama Preferred Green Energy to kill off our National Bird -the Bald Eagle.
> From: lewcoop@aol.com
> To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
>
> HOW OLD ARE YOU LARRY?
>
> On Dec 30, 11:53 am, Larry Talbot <larry.tal...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > How old are you , Lew?
> > > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:08:11 -0800
> >
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Obama Preferred Green Energy to kill off our National Bird -the Bald Eagle.
> > > From: lewc...@aol.com
> > > To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
> >
> > > Obama Preferred Green Energy to kill off our National Bird -the Bald
> > > Eagle.
> >
> > > 11:05 AM, Dec 28, 2012 •
> > > By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON
> >
> > > weeklystandard.com
> >
> > > It's symbolically appropriate that one of President Obama's preferred
> > > forms of "green energy" crony capitalism has the effect of killing off
> > > the national bird. The federal wind production tax credit (PTC) is
> > > mercifully set to expire on New Year's Eve. The PTC provides a
> > > financial boon, at great taxpayer expense, to well-connected companies
> > > that build eyesore wind farms that kill great birds of prey and pretty
> > > much anything else that flies within the range of their "green"
> > > blades. The nonpartisan Institute for Energy Research estimates that
> > > if this cozy arrangement between big government and big business were
> > > to be extended, it would cost American taxpayers $55,000,000,000. The
> > > fate of the PTC — and of that $55 billion— now rests with House
> > > Republicans, who would have to approve the PTC's renewal.
> >
> > > As John Fund writes today at National Review Online:
> >
> > > "[N]o matter how much money is blown its way, wind power — for simple
> > > scientific reasons — can't graduate to the kind of large-scale,
> > > reliable energy production that its backers tout. Physicist and
> > > environmentalist John Droz Jr. notes: 'There is no real environmental
> > > benefit to wind, because a) it's an unpredictable commodity, b) output
> > > from any group of wind projects can and will go to zero on many
> > > occasions, and c) energy generated from industrial wind power cannot
> > > be economically stored.' Germany, which has gone stark raving mad in
> > > building wind turbines, has proven just how unreliable it is. On one
> > > day this February, wind power delivered a third of Germany's
> > > electricity needs, but four days later, on a still day, it contributed
> > > precisely zero."
> >
> > > Fund adds:
> >
> > > "Then there is the carnage inflicted on Mother Nature. Paul Driessen
> > > reported in the Washington Times that 'the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
> > > Service estimates that wind turbines kill 440,000 bald and golden
> > > eagles, hawks, falcons, owls, cranes, egrets, geese, and other birds
> > > every year in the U.S., along with countless insect-eating bats.' The
> > > actual numbers are probably far higher. The turbine blades of the
> > > nation's 39,000 windmills move at 100 to 200 miles per hour and can
> > > mow down anything that gets in their path.
> >
> > > "Over the past 25 years, an estimated 2,300 golden eagles have been
> > > killed by turbines at Altamont Pass, Calif., alone, leading to an 80
> > > percent drop in the golden-eagle population of southern California."
> >
> > > But there is at least one more way in which wind farms undermine,
> > > rather than improve, the environment. They are aesthetically hideous.
> > > At close range, these giant, eagle-killing windmills — and some of
> > > them are giant — look like something implanted on earth by an
> > > unfriendly alien civilization. Nobody would ever want to live near
> > > one.
> >
> > > So, why are liberals so fond of them? Because they never get built in
> > > cities, where liberals live. As for why liberals can overlook the
> > > carnage, that's a good question.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
> > > ---
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > Visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum?hl=en.
> > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> Subject: Re: Obama Preferred Green Energy to kill off our National Bird -the Bald Eagle.
> From: lewcoop@aol.com
> To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
>
> HOW OLD ARE YOU LARRY?
>
> On Dec 30, 11:53 am, Larry Talbot <larry.tal...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > How old are you , Lew?
> > > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:08:11 -0800
> >
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Obama Preferred Green Energy to kill off our National Bird -the Bald Eagle.
> > > From: lewc...@aol.com
> > > To: opendebateforum@googlegroups.com
> >
> > > Obama Preferred Green Energy to kill off our National Bird -the Bald
> > > Eagle.
> >
> > > 11:05 AM, Dec 28, 2012 •
> > > By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON
> >
> > > weeklystandard.com
> >
> > > It's symbolically appropriate that one of President Obama's preferred
> > > forms of "green energy" crony capitalism has the effect of killing off
> > > the national bird. The federal wind production tax credit (PTC) is
> > > mercifully set to expire on New Year's Eve. The PTC provides a
> > > financial boon, at great taxpayer expense, to well-connected companies
> > > that build eyesore wind farms that kill great birds of prey and pretty
> > > much anything else that flies within the range of their "green"
> > > blades. The nonpartisan Institute for Energy Research estimates that
> > > if this cozy arrangement between big government and big business were
> > > to be extended, it would cost American taxpayers $55,000,000,000. The
> > > fate of the PTC — and of that $55 billion— now rests with House
> > > Republicans, who would have to approve the PTC's renewal.
> >
> > > As John Fund writes today at National Review Online:
> >
> > > "[N]o matter how much money is blown its way, wind power — for simple
> > > scientific reasons — can't graduate to the kind of large-scale,
> > > reliable energy production that its backers tout. Physicist and
> > > environmentalist John Droz Jr. notes: 'There is no real environmental
> > > benefit to wind, because a) it's an unpredictable commodity, b) output
> > > from any group of wind projects can and will go to zero on many
> > > occasions, and c) energy generated from industrial wind power cannot
> > > be economically stored.' Germany, which has gone stark raving mad in
> > > building wind turbines, has proven just how unreliable it is. On one
> > > day this February, wind power delivered a third of Germany's
> > > electricity needs, but four days later, on a still day, it contributed
> > > precisely zero."
> >
> > > Fund adds:
> >
> > > "Then there is the carnage inflicted on Mother Nature. Paul Driessen
> > > reported in the Washington Times that 'the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
> > > Service estimates that wind turbines kill 440,000 bald and golden
> > > eagles, hawks, falcons, owls, cranes, egrets, geese, and other birds
> > > every year in the U.S., along with countless insect-eating bats.' The
> > > actual numbers are probably far higher. The turbine blades of the
> > > nation's 39,000 windmills move at 100 to 200 miles per hour and can
> > > mow down anything that gets in their path.
> >
> > > "Over the past 25 years, an estimated 2,300 golden eagles have been
> > > killed by turbines at Altamont Pass, Calif., alone, leading to an 80
> > > percent drop in the golden-eagle population of southern California."
> >
> > > But there is at least one more way in which wind farms undermine,
> > > rather than improve, the environment. They are aesthetically hideous.
> > > At close range, these giant, eagle-killing windmills — and some of
> > > them are giant — look like something implanted on earth by an
> > > unfriendly alien civilization. Nobody would ever want to live near
> > > one.
> >
> > > So, why are liberals so fond of them? Because they never get built in
> > > cities, where liberals live. As for why liberals can overlook the
> > > carnage, that's a good question.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
> > > ---
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > Visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum?hl=en.
> > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> To post to this group, send email to opendebateforum@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to opendebateforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opendebateforum?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
0 comments:
Post a Comment