Also, with reduced reimbursement comes reduced service.
I hear too much of this from the staff at the hospital where I spend 4 hours, 3x a week.
We also have a surgeon on dialysis who knows what is happening to medicine and doesn't hold back.
They are not pleased, but the podiatrist is livid, saying that the government is ultra-slow-paying and his vendors want their money yesterday.
He is like a little whirlwind of rage.
In a message dated 10/31/2012 6:10:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, jgg1000@hotmail.com writes:
Lynn the money "saved" by reduced payment to doctors and hospitals... The question asked was "Will less payments reduce the number of providers???" I have known several doctor (good doctors) retire early of medicine because of the "reduced payments"...
On Saturday, October 27, 2012 10:37:38 AM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:--Forget to answer the question? Romney was really disrespectful, he tells lies - like the $716 BN that was NOT taken from Medicare...Don't you think lies are disrespectful...both to the person they are about and in this case all Americans?What do you think Romeny is really going to do for you?-----Original Message-----
From: jgg1000a <jgg...@hotmail.com>
To: opendebateforum <opendeb...@googlegroups.com >
Sent: Sat, Oct 27, 2012 9:23 am
Subject: Re: The destructivness of Obama's comtemt for the opposition
It looks true only to these looking for racism under every rock...
On Friday, October 26, 2012 6:50:38 PM UTC-4, Lynne wrote:The only problem is that it appears to be true. Why else would Governor of AZ and Willard think it's OK to shake their finger arcade sitting president.--Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&Tjgg1000a <jgg...@hotmail.com> wrote:>The standard Left hate-mongering of calling the opponent "racist" no longer
>is effective outside the faux and intolerant "Progressive" circles...
>
>On Friday, October 26, 2012 3:46:24 PM UTC-4, thema...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> thats fine, we needed a racists point of view and you have provided it, so
>> then stop your butt buddy from whining diengenuously about
>> bipartisanship....
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom <bold...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
>> To: opendebateforum <opendeb...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>
>> Sent: Fri, Oct 26, 2012 2:06 pm
>> Subject: RE: The destructivness of Obama's comtemt for the opposition
>>
>> No, that's intelligence and problem solving.
>>
>> *Tom ***
>> *Defeat the red scourge*
>> *VOTE Romney/Ryan 2012*
>> *Restore America*
>> * *
>> * *
>> * *
>> * *
>> * *
>> * *
>> *"Send Lawyers, Guns, and Money,*
>> *The Shit has hit the Fan"*
>> *"Hiding in Honduras" *
>> *- Warren Zevon*
>>
>> *From:* opendeb...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> [
>> mailto:open...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *
>> thema...@aol.com <javascript:>
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 26, 2012 10:39 AM
>> *To:* opendeb...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> *Subject:* Re: The destructivness of Obama's comtemt for the opposition
>>
>> bi partisan?
>>
>> your hero, mitch mkkkonnel said the reptilican goal was to make Obama a
>> one terner, is that bi partisanm, you hapless dupe?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jgg1000a <jgg...@hotmail.com <javascript:>>
>> To: opendebateforum <opendeb...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>>
>> Sent: Fri, Oct 26, 2012 11:27 am
>> Subject: The destructivness of Obama's comtemt for the opposition
>> and why Obama can not be bi-partisan... Obama and his his supporters
>> demand respect from others (complain about disrespect) when they fully show
>> disrespect to the opponents...
>>
>>
>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020453050457807 9232194509700.html?mod=WSJ_ hpp_sections_opinion
>>
>> >>>
>> Why was the first debate so toxic for the president? Because the one
>> thing he couldn't do if he was going to win the election is let all the
>> pent-up resentment toward him erupt. Americans had gotten used to him as
>> The President. Whatever his policy choices, whatever general direction he
>> seemed to put in place he was The President, a man who had gotten there
>> through natural gifts and what all politicians need, good fortune.
>> What he couldn't do was present himself, when everyone was looking, as
>> smaller than you thought. Petulant, put upon, above it all, full of
>> himself. He couldn't afford to make himself look less impressive than the
>> challenger in terms of command, grasp of facts, size.
>> But that's what he did.
>> And in some utterly new way the president was revealed, *exposed.* All
>> the people whose job it is to surround and explain him, to act as his
>> buffers and protectors—they weren't there. It was him on the stage, alone
>> with a competitor. He didn't have a teleprompter, and so his failure seemed
>> to underscore the cliché that the prompter is a kind of umbilical cord for
>> him, something that provides nourishment, the thing he needs to sound good.
>> He is not by any means a stupid man but he has become a boring one; he
>> drones, he is predictable, it's never new. The teleprompter adds substance,
>> or at least safety.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
>>
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
>For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDeb...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateFor...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
0 comments:
Post a Comment