cant agree more KK.....
Andy Chikando Kaonga
Legal Advisor & RSD Supervisor
RSD Unit
Department of Refugees
Private Bag 331
Lilongwe 3
Malawi
Legal Advisor & RSD Supervisor
RSD Unit
Department of Refugees
Private Bag 331
Lilongwe 3
Malawi
----- Original Message -----
From: kalekenikaphale <kalekenikaphale@sdnp.org.mw>
To: malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 10:49 AM
Subject: LAWYER ARRESTS
why do i pick faint signals or whispers of ''nayenso akhaule'' in the sub text of the
recent postings on the above issue?
If that is what needs to be said, by jove, go ahead and say it. Its your right to
express yourself.
but remember, we have a noble duty to stand for truth and justice, regardless. the type
of duty that makes you represent anders brejvik, or nachipanti, among others.
something is making me uneasy about us as a club.
kk.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:01:24 +0000, Sundu wrote
> Ndi mom'mo ndithu!
>
> Sent from my BlackBerryŽ smartphone 'aired' by Airtel Malawi.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vulula gondwe <vululagondwe@gmail.com>
> Sender: malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:56:47
> To: <malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com>
> Reply-To: malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Standard of proof...
>
> Redson,
>
> I believe the position of the law at (No) Case to Answer stage remains as
> it was the last time you appeared in criminal proceedings ie it is not
> beyond reasonable doubt. It is "that the prosecution at this stage of the
> trial only need to show that there is a prima facie case before the court
> made out against the Accused. This has to be decided by the Court on the
> balance of probabilities.The question is: is there evidence before the
> court on which a reasonable tribunal may, not would, convict the Accused?"
>
> I reckon that you read that from Nyasatimes. The writer of that story was
> not in court. When he met me outside the Court, I only confirmed that my
> Client has been acquitted.
>
> Reading his article makes me angry. Neither the Magistrate nor myself said
> any of those things he attributes to us.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Redson Kapindu <rkapindu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Somewhere I read: "Having heard from both parties, I am of the view that
> > the state has failed to prove to this court beyond reasonable doubt on the
> > reason why this court should continue with the case."
> >
> > At what stage of the proceedings does this standard apply?...It's been a
> > while since I appeared in court, let alone in criminal proceedings...
> >
> > RedK
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "malawi_lawsociety" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "malawi_lawsociety" group. To post to this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "malawi_lawsociety" group. To post to this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "malawi_lawsociety" group.
To post to this group, send email to malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
From: kalekenikaphale <kalekenikaphale@sdnp.org.mw>
To: malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 10:49 AM
Subject: LAWYER ARRESTS
why do i pick faint signals or whispers of ''nayenso akhaule'' in the sub text of the
recent postings on the above issue?
If that is what needs to be said, by jove, go ahead and say it. Its your right to
express yourself.
but remember, we have a noble duty to stand for truth and justice, regardless. the type
of duty that makes you represent anders brejvik, or nachipanti, among others.
something is making me uneasy about us as a club.
kk.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:01:24 +0000, Sundu wrote
> Ndi mom'mo ndithu!
>
> Sent from my BlackBerryŽ smartphone 'aired' by Airtel Malawi.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vulula gondwe <vululagondwe@gmail.com>
> Sender: malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:56:47
> To: <malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com>
> Reply-To: malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Standard of proof...
>
> Redson,
>
> I believe the position of the law at (No) Case to Answer stage remains as
> it was the last time you appeared in criminal proceedings ie it is not
> beyond reasonable doubt. It is "that the prosecution at this stage of the
> trial only need to show that there is a prima facie case before the court
> made out against the Accused. This has to be decided by the Court on the
> balance of probabilities.The question is: is there evidence before the
> court on which a reasonable tribunal may, not would, convict the Accused?"
>
> I reckon that you read that from Nyasatimes. The writer of that story was
> not in court. When he met me outside the Court, I only confirmed that my
> Client has been acquitted.
>
> Reading his article makes me angry. Neither the Magistrate nor myself said
> any of those things he attributes to us.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Redson Kapindu <rkapindu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Somewhere I read: "Having heard from both parties, I am of the view that
> > the state has failed to prove to this court beyond reasonable doubt on the
> > reason why this court should continue with the case."
> >
> > At what stage of the proceedings does this standard apply?...It's been a
> > while since I appeared in court, let alone in criminal proceedings...
> >
> > RedK
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "malawi_lawsociety" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "malawi_lawsociety" group. To post to this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "malawi_lawsociety" group. To post to this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "malawi_lawsociety" group.
To post to this group, send email to malawi_lawsociety@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to malawi_lawsociety+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/malawi_lawsociety?hl=en.
0 comments:
Post a Comment