Thanx a lot
They've already been posted. Check www.clat.ac.inSent on my BlackBerry® from VodafoneFrom: Shlok Parekh <parekhshlok@gmail.com>Sender: clat-11@googlegroups.comDate: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:20:51 +0530To: <clat-11@googlegroups.com>ReplyTo: clat-11@googlegroups.comSubject: Re: [LST] Re: legal doubt-5Guyz what time are the clat results today?????
On May 25, 2012 2:23 PM, "Shreeja Kumar" <shreeja95@gmail.com> wrote:shud be C i guess
On 12 May 2012 11:27, "Aditi Agarwal" <agrwl.aditi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The principle mentions distinguish their "product"!the cows are not
> their products here so there exists no trademark only!!so that's y d
> ans should be C I guess!!
> On May 12, 3:10 am, Shruti Vaidya <shrutivaidya2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think that the two guys are in the course of trade ! Like
> > shivam used the mark so that he can identify the cows and that's not a
> > part of trade so I think the answer is 3 !
> >
> > On 12/05/2012, Sayan Basak <bustedyo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Facts: Shivam used a mark to brand all his cows so that his cows could
> > > be identified. Bhupendra also started using the same mark to brand his
> > > cows with the intension that at grazing field cows would mix up and he
> > > can take Shivam's good breed cows.
> >
> > > Principle: Trade Mark is a mark used by business people to
> > > distinguish their product from that of others. In order to be a
> > > trademark it must be used in the course of trade. Any person using
> > > Trademark of others for his products shall be punished.
> >
> > > Answers:
> > > 1. Bhupendra must be punished because he used trade mark of Shivam.
> > > 2. Bhupendra cannot be punished because he has branded his cows.
> > > 3. Bhupendra cannot be punished for using his mark because it is not a
> > > trademark.
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my mobile device


0 comments:
Post a Comment