Re: Here are some facts about the debt and the deficit and Bush and Obama

The salient point is that TARP was a Bush initiative. My concern is the apparent symbiosis between the white house and golden sacks.

Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T

mg <mgkelson@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I know there have been some congressional proposals to amend TARP, but
>I don't know if any of them have passed. It seems like I remember
>something about the idea of converting the money owed to the
>government to common stock, but I don't know if that ever happened.
>
>One can get lost quickly and not be able to see the forest for the
>trees when talking about a fantasy Obama spree. The question I have
>been asking right wingers for a long time now, though, is to tell me
>specifically where he spent all that money if they believe he has been
>on a spending spree, and of course they never can, except for blaming
>the stimulus for everything.
>
>On May 28, 4:25 pm, EARL DOYLE <lesjul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MG, Obama made an amendment to TARP
>>
>> On 5/28/12, mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> > The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was signed into law by George
>> > W. Bush on October 3, 2008. Obama didn't become president until Jan.
>> > 20, 2009.
>>
>> > On May 28, 12:12 pm, jgg1000a <jgg1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Tarp was a joint product of Bush and Obama...
>>
>> >> On May 26, 5:02 pm, lynn...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> >> > Lew evidently has some memory problems...TARP and the early stimulus
>> >> > packages were BUSH initiatives, just a NAFTA belonged to his daddy. L
>>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com>
>> >> > To: Open Debate Political Forum IMHO <opendebateforum@googlegroups.com>
>> >> > Sent: Sat, May 26, 2012 11:34 am
>> >> > Subject: Re: Here are some facts about the debt and the deficit and Bush
>> >> > and Obama
>>
>> >> > As I said in my original post, most economists agree that the one-time
>> >> > spending for the stimulus
>> >> > was necessary and
>> >> > beneficial.http://www.advisorone.com/2012/02/17/the-stimulus-three-years-on-did-...
>>
>> >> > In addition, the consensus among nonideological economists is that the
>> >> > measures taken by Obama and the Federal Reserve prevented the
>> >> > recession from becoming worse or even turning into a second Great
>> >> > Depression.http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/02/fact-check-romney-on-th...
>>
>> >> > On May 26, 5:08 am, lew <lewc...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> > > Bush is not running for president.
>>
>> >> > > Obama solved nothing and the country became worse under Obama.
>>
>> >> > > TIME FOR A CHANGE !
>>
>> >> > > On May 26, 3:47 am, mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > The costs ballooned before Obama took office. As I said, the CBO
>> >> > > > estimated that the deficit for fiscal year 2009 (10/1/2008 -
>> >> > > > 9/30/2009) would be $1.2 trillion before Obama was even sworn in as
>> >> > > > president.http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/27/barack...
>>
>> >> > > > If you look at the graph at the following website, you can see
>> >> > > > exactly
>> >> > > > what caused the $1.2 trillion deficit in 2009 and subsequent years.
>> >> > > > Note that for 2009 a lot of it was because of the economic crash
>> >> > > > and
>> >> > > > the TARP bailout. Here's a quote from the referenced article:
>>
>> >> > > > "The recession battered the budget, driving down tax revenues and
>> >> > > > swelling outlays for unemployment insurance, food stamps, and other
>> >> > > > safety-net programs.[3] Using CBO's August 2008 projections as a
>> >> > > > benchmark, we calculate that the changed economic outlook alone
>> >> > > > accounts for over $400 billion of the deficit each year in 2009
>> >> > > > through 2011 and slightly smaller amounts in subsequent years.
>> >> > > > Those
>> >> > > > effects persist; even in 2018, the deterioration in the economy
>> >> > > > since
>> >> > > > the summer of 2008 will account for over $300 billion in added
>> >> > > > deficits, much of it in the form of additional debt-service costs."
>>
>> >> > > >http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3490
>>
>> >> > > > On May 25, 8:39 am, lew <lewc...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > Bush never signed a 2009 budget.  Just Obama has never signed a
>> >> > > > > 2010,
>> >> > > > > 2011, 2012 nor 2013 budget.
>>
>> >> > > > > Why is Obama over-spending income by $1.5 trillion dollars while
>> >> > > > > Bush
>> >> > > > > never over spent income by more than $600 Bilion dollars with the
>> >> > > > > exact same wars?  Bush was fighting those wars for 5 and 6 years.
>> >> > > > >  Al
>> >> > > > > the sudden the costs balloned when Obama shows up?
>>
>> >> > > > > On May 25, 10:15 am, mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > The cost of the wars will continue to add up long after they are
>> >> > > > > > over.
>> >> > > > > > By one estimate the total cost will be $4
>> >> > > > > > trillion.http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/much-wars-cost-report-says-4-tril...
>>
>> >> > > > > > The budget for Oct 2008 to Sept. 2009 began as a spending
>> >> > > > > > request by
>> >> > > > > > Bush, who had been in office 8 years, and was signed by Obama on
>> >> > > > > > Mar
>> >> > > > > > 12, 2009, which was about 50 days after he took office. If
>> >> > > > > > someone
>> >> > > > > > plants a time bomb, he doesn't have to sign it to make it go
>> >> > > > > > off.
>>
>> >> > > > > > It's very true that Obama has failed to end the war that Bush
>> >> > > > > > started.
>> >> > > > > > However, it's also true that it's easier to start a war than it
>> >> > > > > > is to
>> >> > > > > > end it.
>>
>> >> > > > > > Obama hasn't spent very much money that I know of except for
>> >> > > > > > the
>> >> > > > > > stimulus and except for continuing the policies that were in
>> >> > > > > > place
>> >> > > > > > when he took office. In fact, when you think about it, what
>> >> > > > > > significant amounts of money has he spent, except for the
>> >> > > > > > stimulus
>> >> > > > > > money and what money did George Bush spent and what did he spend
>> >> > > > > > it
>> >> > > > > > on?
>>
>> >> > > > > > On May 25, 6:55 am, lew <lewc...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > How did Iraq explin so much deficit?
>>
>> >> > > > > > > The Itraq War only cost about $1 trillionfrom beginning to
>> >> > > > > > > end. - Same
>> >> > > > > > > as the Styimulus that went to the unions.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > Afhanistan is "Obama's War."  The War we need to fight in
>> >> > > > > > > Obama's
>> >> > > > > > > words.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > P.S.: Bush never signed a budget for 2009.  All the spending
>> >> > > > > > > in 2009
>> >> > > > > > > is Obama'spending.  Obama has been over spending his income by
>> >> > > > > > > about
>> >> > > > > > > $1,5 trillion each year.  The most Bush ever over spent his
>> >> > > > > > > income is
>> >> > > > > > > about $400 Billion. - About 2 1/2 timnes the Bush rate of
>> >> > > > > > > overspending. in  Bush's worst year.
>>
>> >> > > > > > > On May 25, 8:44 am, mg <mgkel...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > In doing a little bit of research, I came up with the
>> >> > > > > > > > following
>> >> > > > > > > > information which appears to be completely accurate:
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > 1. Before Obama was even sworn in as president, the CBO
>> >> > > > > > > > estimated
>> >> > that
>> >> > > > > > > > the deficit for for fiscal year 2009 (10/1/2008 - 9/30/2009)
>> >> > > > > > > > would
>> >> > be
>> >> > > > > > > > $1.2
>> >> > > > > > > > trillion.http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/27/barack...
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > 2. Only a relatively small amount of the stimulus money was
>> >> > > > > > > > spent in
>> >> > > > > > > > fiscal year 2009. The stimulus didn't really begin to ramp
>> >> > > > > > > > up until
>> >> > Q1
>> >> > > > > > > > of
>> >> > > > > > > > 2010.http://keithhennessey.com/2009/06/03/will-the-stimulus-come-too-late/
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > 3. Most economists agree that the one-time spending for the
>> >> > > > > > > > stimulus
>> >> > > > > > > > was necessary and
>> >> > > > > > > > beneficial.http://www.advisorone.com/2012/02/17/the-stimulus-three-years-on-did-...
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > 4. The growth in government spending under President Obama
>> >> > > > > > > > has been
>> >> > > > > > > > slower than during the Bush and Reagan administrations.
>> >> > > > > > > > Federal
>> >> > > > > > > > spending is lower now than it was when Obama took office.
>> >> > > > > > > > The so
>> >> > > > > > > > called Obama spending binge never
>> >> > > > > > > > happened.http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/19/446990/obama-bush-reagan-......
>>
>> >> > > > > > > > 5. "The economic downturn, President Bush's tax cuts and the
>> >> > > > > > > > wars in
>> >> > > > > > > > Afghanistan and Iraq explain virtually the entire deficit
>> >> > > > > > > > over the
>> >> > > > > > > > next ten years (see Figure
>> >> > > > > > > > 1)."http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3490
>>
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> > Groups "Open
>> >> > Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> > OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> >> > For more options, visit this group
>> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> > "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
>To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en