Re: Rasmussen: Hope for Future Generations at All-Time Low, 55% Want Obamacare Repeal

LOL, Lew, under Bush we had recession and near economic collapse, Under Obama we HAVE a recovery, enough said.

On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:00:08 AM UTC-4, lew wrote:

The recovery has seen higher unemployment than the recssion.

We need a new president.

On Jul 31, 8:38 am, thematte...@aol.com wrote:
> thanks, bush, for the depression you left america...that is the bush legacy, war and depression, and you want more, that makes you a certified fool, kreepy, you spineless dickweed....
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lew <lewc...@aol.com>
> To: Open Debate Political Forum IMHO <opendebateforum@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Tue, Jul 31, 2012 6:53 am
> Subject: Rasmussen: Hope for Future Generations at All-Time Low, 55% Want Obamacare Repeal
>
> Rasmussen: Hope for Future Generations at All-Time Low, 55% Want
> Obamacare Repeal
>
> rushlimbaugh.com
>
> RUSH: Rasmussen: "Hope for the future generation has reached an all-
> time low."  I mean, this is an accurate portrayal of this country with
> Obama running it.  "Just 14% of Americans expect today's children to
> be better off than their parents. The latest Rasmussen Reports
> national telephone survey finds that 65% of American Adults do not
> expect today's children to be better off than their parents. Twenty-
> one percent (21%) are not sure what to expect. The national survey of
> 1,000 Adults nationwide was conducted on July 22-23, 2012 by Rasmussen
> Reports." Margin of error, plus or minus three.  It's the lowest
> ever.  Sixty-five percent.
>
> That is an illustration of just how much liberalism has sucked the
> hope out of the American people.  And that's what they continue to
> do.  That's the only thing they've got to do in their campaign, is try
> to dispirit you, take away any hope that it can get any better. There
> isn't anybody that can it do any better than Obama.  Anybody that's
> gonna try is lying to you.  And, by the way, it's pretty damn good
> considering the way the rest of the world has it.  You better learn to
> like this.  Also, according to today's Rasmussen poll, 55% of voters
> want Obamacare repealed.  Only 39% do not.  So the opening Olympic
> cermonies didn't have much impact, 'cause that number isn't changing
> at all here.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open
> Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
> To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en

Re: Rasmussen: Hope for Future Generations at All-Time Low, 55% Want Obamacare Repeal

Rasmussen the Poll that had McCain winning by a landslide.... how did that work out?

On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:53:24 AM UTC-4, lew wrote:

Rasmussen: Hope for Future Generations at All-Time Low, 55% Want
Obamacare Repeal

rushlimbaugh.com

RUSH: Rasmussen: "Hope for the future generation has reached an all-
time low."  I mean, this is an accurate portrayal of this country with
Obama running it.  "Just 14% of Americans expect today's children to
be better off than their parents. The latest Rasmussen Reports
national telephone survey finds that 65% of American Adults do not
expect today's children to be better off than their parents. Twenty-
one percent (21%) are not sure what to expect. The national survey of
1,000 Adults nationwide was conducted on July 22-23, 2012 by Rasmussen
Reports." Margin of error, plus or minus three.  It's the lowest
ever.  Sixty-five percent.

That is an illustration of just how much liberalism has sucked the
hope out of the American people.  And that's what they continue to
do.  That's the only thing they've got to do in their campaign, is try
to dispirit you, take away any hope that it can get any better. There
isn't anybody that can it do any better than Obama.  Anybody that's
gonna try is lying to you.  And, by the way, it's pretty damn good
considering the way the rest of the world has it.  You better learn to
like this.  Also, according to today's Rasmussen poll, 55% of voters
want Obamacare repealed.  Only 39% do not.  So the opening Olympic
cermonies didn't have much impact, 'cause that number isn't changing
at all here.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en

Re: WMD to be destrory in Iraq by the Brits

No these were the remnants from the FIRST Iraq war that were under guard by the EUEA in secured bunkers that Saddam had no access to until AFTER the undermanned Bush invasion, THEN the munition depots were looted AFTER Missiion Accomplished and these munitions were used for IEDS.

Ignorance is Bliss

On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:14:30 PM UTC-4, jgg1000a wrote:

and I thought Iraq did not have any...   Perhaps the Lefty narrative got it wrong...

http://news.yahoo.com/uk-experts-help-iraq-destroy-chemical-residues-144204378.html

>>> Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what's left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.

The British Defense Ministry will start training Iraqi technical and medical workers this year, an embassy statement said. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddam's regime. He was overthrown in 2003 following an American-led invasion.

Saddam stored the chemical weapons near population centers so that he could access them quickly, despite the danger to his civilian population.

Most of Iraq's chemical weapons were destroyed by military forces in 1991 during the first Gulf War or by U.N. inspectors after the fighting. The inspections halted just before the invasion.

Iraq is a party to the U.N. Chemical Weapons Convention and must get rid of the remaining material, according to terms of the pact.

The head of the Iraqi National Authority, Mohammed Al Sharaa, said the remnants "represent a great challenge to the Iraqi experts to safely dispose." He called the agreement with British authorities "a good opportunity for Iraqi experts to benefit from the well-known expertise of U.K. experts."

British Ambassador to Iraq Simon Collis said Britain is glad to assist in what he called "this difficult and dangerous task."

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Debate Political Forum IMHO" group.
To post to this group, send email to OpenDebateForum@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to OpenDebateForum-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum?hl=en